Skip to content
Three horizontal bars of equal width, each the range a company guided to for third-quarter 2026 deliveries, floor on the left and ceiling on the right: NIO 108,000 to 111,000, XPeng 115,000 to 121,000, Li Auto 95,000 to 100,000. A pale marker shows where actual deliveries landed. NIO's 109,178 sits about two-fifths of the way up, XPeng's 118,390 just past halfway, and Li Auto's 99,964 almost exactly at the ceiling.
Third-quarter 2026 delivery guidance against actual deliveries. Every range is drawn at the same width, so a marker's position is the share of the way from floor to ceiling, not a volume. The guided ranges come from each company's Q2 results release. Northline Post

EV & mobility · Analysis

Q3 guidance scorecard: three hits, and Li Auto finished 36 vehicles from its ceiling

NIO, XPeng and Li Auto each delivered inside the third-quarter range they gave. NIO landed 39.3% of the way up its range, XPeng 56.5%, Li Auto 99.3%. All three set their ranges with part of the quarter already delivered.

By Michael Westergaard · 1 Oct 2026 · 6 min


NIO guided to between 108,000 and 111,000 vehicles for the third quarter and delivered 109,178. XPeng guided to 115,000 to 121,000 and delivered 118,390. Li Auto guided to 95,000 to 100,000 and delivered 99,964. All three hit. That is the headline; the more useful numbers sit underneath it.

CompanyGuided rangeActualPosition in rangeDistance
NIO108,000 to 111,000109,17839.3%1,178 over floor
XPeng115,000 to 121,000118,39056.5%3,390 over floor
Li Auto95,000 to 100,00099,96499.3%36 under ceiling
Ranges are from each company's Q2 2026 results release, published 1 September (NIO), 24 August (XPeng) and 26 August (Li Auto). Position and distance calculated by Northline Post. Li Auto's 99,964 is the sum of three monthly releases; it publishes no quarterly total until its Q3 results.

The range is the other half of the score

Hitting a range says less than it appears to, because ranges differ in width. NIO's was 3,000 vehicles wide, 2.7% of its midpoint. XPeng's was 6,000, 5.1% of its midpoint, and Li Auto's 5,000, 5.1% of its own.

NIO's width is new. Its second-quarter range was 110,000 to 115,000, 5,000 wide, and it delivered 107,658, which is 2,342 below the floor. It then guided a narrower range for the third quarter and landed inside it. A company that missed its last floor and then narrowed its range was making a more precise claim, and this time it held.

A guide set mid-quarter is a guide about the rest of it

None of the three published its range at the start of the quarter. Each arrived in a results release after the quarter had begun: XPeng's on 24 August and Li Auto's on 26 August, both with July delivered, and NIO's on 1 September, the same day as its August figure. Subtract what was already known and each guide becomes a statement about the months that remained.

CompanyKnown when guidedImplied rest of Q3DeliveredNeeded vs last known month
XPeng38,027 (July)76,973 to 82,97380,363+1.2% to +9.1%
Li Auto30,468 (July)64,532 to 69,53269,496+5.9% to +14.1%
NIO71,770 (July, August)36,230 to 39,23037,408+1.1% to +9.5%
Known figures are from the Q2 results releases (XPeng, Li Auto) and the July and August delivery updates (NIO). Implied ranges, delivered remainders and required changes calculated by Northline Post. XPeng and Li Auto: the average of August and September against July. NIO: September against August's 35,836.

Li Auto needed its two remaining months to average between 5.9% and 14.1% above July, and averaged 14.0% above it. It got there on August, which came in at 37,679, and September then gave back 15.6%. A company that finishes 36 vehicles under its ceiling after a month like that was close to the edge of what its own range allowed. NIO needed September to be 1.1% to 9.5% above August and got 4.4%. XPeng needed 1.2% to 9.1% and got 5.7%.

Revenue guidance cannot be scored yet, and it says something else

The same releases guided revenue. That is scored with the Q3 results, but the percentages the companies attach to it already say something about the car mix, because revenue divided by deliveries is revenue per vehicle.

CompanyGuided deliveries YoYGuided revenueGuided revenue YoYRevenue per vehicle YoY
NIO+24.0% to +27.5%RMB33.3bn to RMB34.1bn+52.7% to +56.2%about +23%
XPeng-0.87% to +4.30%RMB21.7bn to RMB23.4bn+6.47% to +14.81%+7% to +10%
Li Auto+1.9% to +7.3%RMB26.6bn to RMB28.0bn-2.8% to +2.3%about -5%
Ranges and year-on-year changes as stated in each company's Q2 2026 results release. Revenue per vehicle is the guided revenue change divided by the guided delivery change at each end of the range, calculated by Northline Post; it is arithmetic on guidance, not a company figure.

Read that way, NIO guided to roughly 23% more revenue per car, XPeng to 7% to 10% more, and Li Auto to about 5% less while guiding volume up. The margin side of that trade is in what EV gross margin actually measures. The Q3 results will say whether the guided mix showed up.

What has not been guided

None of the three Q2 results releases carries a fourth-quarter or full-year delivery figure, and BYD's monthly announcements carry no forecast at all. This scorecard covers what the companies put in writing in their releases. Remarks made on earnings calls may go further, and we have not scored them here.

What can be said without a forecast is how high last year's bar was. Matching the fourth quarter of 2025 would take these changes on the third quarter of 2026:

CompanyQ4 2025Q3 2026Change to match Q4 2025
NIO124,807109,178+14.3%
Li Auto109,19499,964+9.2%
BYD1,342,2901,323,065+1.5%
XPeng116,249118,390-1.8%
Q4 2025 and Q3 2026 deliveries from the companies' own releases. Where a company publishes no quarterly total (BYD, and Li Auto for Q3 2026) the quarter is the sum of its monthly releases, and BYD is NEV units sold. The change needed is calculated by Northline Post and is arithmetic about last year's quarter, not a forecast.

XPeng has already delivered more than it did in last year's fourth quarter. NIO would need the largest step up. The first fourth-quarter ranges should arrive with the Q3 results; if each release follows the pattern of the Q2 ones, this scorecard will have a Q4 row.

For the quarter itself, the numbers behind the ranges are in Q3 deliveries: NIO and BYD grew by double digits, XPeng and Li Auto did not.

Sources

  1. NIO Q2 2026 unaudited financial results (Q3 guidance, 1 September 2026)
  2. NIO Q1 2026 unaudited financial results (Q2 guidance, 21 May 2026)
  3. NIO October 2025 delivery update
  4. NIO November 2025 delivery update
  5. NIO December 2025 delivery update
  6. NIO June 2026 delivery update
  7. NIO July 2026 delivery update
  8. NIO August 2026 delivery update
  9. NIO September and third quarter 2026 delivery update
  10. XPENG Q2 2026 unaudited financial results (Q3 guidance, 24 August 2026)
  11. XPENG vehicle delivery results for September and Q3 2026
  12. XPENG Q4 and FY2025 results
  13. Li Auto Q2 2026 unaudited financial results (Q3 guidance, July 2026 deliveries, delivery history table, 26 August 2026)
  14. Li Auto August 2026 delivery update
  15. Li Auto September 2026 delivery update
  16. BYD production and sales volume announcement, October 2025
  17. BYD production and sales volume announcement, November 2025
  18. BYD production and sales volume announcement, December 2025
  19. BYD production and sales volume announcement, July 2026
  20. BYD production and sales volume announcement, August 2026
  21. BYD production and sales volume announcement, September 2026
  22. Guided ranges and the percentages attached to them are quoted from each company's Q2 results release. Deliveries are from the delivery updates and results releases above. Positions, distances, implied remainders, revenue per vehicle and the changes needed to match Q4 2025 are calculated by Northline Post.

Northline Post publishes information and opinion, not investment advice. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The author may hold positions in companies covered.

Related reading

More on NIO Inc

Four ownership trees on a dark ground. BYD branches to BYD, Denza, Fangchengbao and Yangwang; Geely Holding Group to Geely, Zeekr, Lynk & Co and Volvo; SAIC Motor to MG, Roewe, Rising Auto and IM Motors; Changan Automobile to Deepal, Avatr and Changan. A dashed circle at the right lists GAC, Dongfeng, Chery, Changcheng and JAC as others. A row of cars stands beneath each group.

EV & mobility

Chinese EV brands: who owns what

Denza, Yangwang, ONVO, MONA, Zeekr, Lynk & Co, MG, Avatr. Most of the names arriving in Europe belong to seven groups, one of which also owns Volvo, and one phone company that owns no carmaker at all.

12 Sept 2026 · Deep dive · 10 min

All coverage of NIO Inc

More on XPeng

All coverage of XPeng